Devoured is a story
that will be enjoyed by readers who like literary historical mysteries that are
on the cozy side, with a few grisly murders à la Hannibal Lecter thrown into it.
These are original, devious killings, far from the usual strangling or simple
gunshot: one victim is pinned to the floor and opened up like a specimen under
study; another one is eviscerated, stuffed and sewed back together in leather.
An interesting aspect of the story is the intriguing parallel plot that has
taken place before the actual story but is revealed through letters sent from
Borneo. Benjamin Broderig, an entomologist/specimen collector, sends these letters to a Lady
Bessingham. The missives become the reason for some of the killings because
they narrate the events of a scientific expedition and its discoveries,
disputes and deaths. Their content is considered sacrilegious and heretic by
many, but groundbreaking and scientifically important by others.
The
era is described accurately throughout the book and the locations are depicted
in precise details. The reader gets immersed in the London of 1856 with its bad
smells, dirty streets, dark alleys and constant bustle; but where the author
succeeds even more is in creating a sense of paranoia and chaos between science
and religion. Also, Meredith demonstrates some of her writing skills when
describing the jungles and wilderness of Borneo: “Ants crawl across the paper as I write. Geckoes hang, pink embryos,
winking knowingly at me. For this is a world where spirits dwell in every rock
and crevice. They weave in rivers and lie waiting, breathless in the ground”, “Nature
isn’t tamed here, as it is in Ashbourne. It bursts out and clamours. It creeps,
weaves, and glistens.” It all
made me a bit more interested by what happened there during the scientific
expedition; I was always looking forward to the next letter where I’d learn more
about the cause of what was happening in London.
Lady
Bessingham was murdered because of her great interest in the progress of science
and more specifically in the new theories of evolution; the scientific view
instead of the holy one. She wanted the letters to become public knowledge, to
be published, but Benjamin Broderig wanted to wait a while, afraid of the dangerous
repercussions. Other people, for different reasons, were ready to go through a
lot of trouble –and mischief and murder-- to get their hands on these letters.
The
natural first suspect is usually the husband or lover or close friend of the
victim. Why Mr. Broderig is not right away the prime suspect left me doubting
the capabilities of Scotland Yard’s Inspector Adams, supposedly famous because
of the success of previous cases. But as we learn, Mr. Adams has other things
on his mind and his investigation of the murders is a bit uninterested and very
flawed. So here come Hatton and Roumande to save the day. Professor Adolphus
Hatton is a pathologist and Frenchman Armand Roumande is the morgue assistant, an
expert of the human body. Together, they work closely to try to perfect the art of finding the causes of death. They
work almost in secret, although Scotland Yard is starting to see the usefulness
of their science and calls on them more often than not. Still, their work is
controversial.
D.E.
Meredith shows a lot of restraint in developing the story slowly, from many
points of views (maybe a few too many), and the suspense builds up nicely. The
characters seem to follow the same leisurely pace, going from one spot to
another (sometimes from one crime scene to another) either on foot, by coach or
train. The rhythm picks up towards the last quarter of the book, sparked by the
reading of the last letter, and the story concludes on a few more surprises and
deaths.
The
main problem here is that the story is a bit uneven, sometimes focusing on
unnecessary details and following too many characters around; a focus on Hatton
and Roumande would have been preferable from start to finish, while still keeping
the letters throughout the story.
I
enjoyed reading Devoured and the few negative aspects won’t deter me from
reading the next D.E. Meredith’s
novel. After all, this was her debut
and I’d rather read a first novel with some flaws, followed by a second one
that is better, than reading an almost perfect first book and be disappointed
by the next one.
You
can visit D.E. Meredith at www.demeredith.com
JF
July
2011
P.S.:
The text would have needed a little editing and a lot of proof-reading –or at
least a spell-check—because there were many misspellings and a few typos; these
are to be expected in an advance readers or proof copy, but I’ve read the story
from a published hardcover. You might say that it’s only a minor irritation,
and I’d agree if it would happen only once or twice, but I counted at least a
dozen. Obviously, I don’t hold it against the author.
-30-
I see you have a link to the Harrogate Crime Writing Festival in July. I'll be there and can't wait. If you're going let me know.
ReplyDeleteI wish I could fly there. Not this year, unfortunately. Don't forget to send me an ARC or finished copy of your book. I've looked for your poetry also but can't find it here in Canada.
ReplyDeleteBless you for looking, Jacques but my poetry has never been released outside of the UK. However, my first collection In The Raw is now available on Kindle.
ReplyDeleteI'll be in touch nearer the release date for Blood Tears.